Alright, So I cannot tell a lie. I definitely own a 300mm, but it is currently being lent out to someone. I ended up using my next tightest focal length, which is the tight end of my 24-105mm. All of these photos are shot at 105mm.
These photos were taken on a little excursion that I went on with another class. We went to an extremely old home in Washington City to shoot with a model, and the old decrepit details of this home were so unreal and cool that it was the perfect opportunity to shoot some detail shots. While I know that I said shooting with only a wide lens was difficult, I found challenges with just shooting tight as well. some shots that I wanted to take required a wider focal length. I definitely see the benefit of having multiple lenses, and being able to change them out quickly and efficiently.
I love shooting tight, for multiple reasons.
- The first, is the fact that I can get in very close without being intrusive of the subject that I am shooting (Fun fact: Shooting long focal lengths at wedding receptions is great, because I don't get the cheesy posed shots, and I feel a little bit like I'm on safari hahah).
- The second is the fact that I'm obsessed with the compression that is created. Though I only have a couple of photographs of a person here, the compression that is created by a long focal length is very flattering to most people.
- The third is that i love the added depth of field. Though this lens is an f/4, the bokeh in the back of the images resembles that of my 50mm at around a 2.8, because of the fact that I'm' so far away from the subject.
One of the biggest benefits that I see for using a tight lens as a photojournalist, is the fact that you are able to capture so much detail, without having to be up in the subject's face. It gives you more of an opportunity to get in close.