Peer Critique

Woops - definitely did not realize that this needed to be a post. I decided to check out and critique William's portfolio, mostly because I knew that it would be stellar because he's such a talented photographer.

I love how simple the whole portfolio is, and I love the fact that he utilized as much space as possible. I love the fact that where there is not photographic material, there is a white background. I think this adds to the simplicity.

I also love the fact that he didn't overwhelm us with photos. He chose his very best, and to me, that is what makes his portfolio strong. Quality over quantity.

Great job, William!

And thanks to everyone for a great semester. :)

Final: Portfolio

http://d00249150.wix.com/nicolewinonacomm3530#!Home/mainPage

Package: Whitewashing the D

Feature News: Living Conditions of Downtown Ensenada, Mexico

I took my feature story photos a couple of weeks ago when I was in Mexico. This was the second time that I've been there, and I thought that it would make for a visually appealing story. 

Each time that I visit Mexico, I realize that I'm lucky to have the life that I have, and I think that some of these photos do a good job of conveying why.

Illustrative Photojournalism: Light Pollution

Photo by Nicole Winona

 14mm 2.8, 30 seconds, ISO 500

Photo by Nicole Winona

 14mm 2.8, 30 seconds, ISO 500

*disclaimer: I'm turning in the above two photos as my assignment, and am using the photos below ONLY as supplementary material to back up my take on the issue.

I decided to take a stance on the issue of light pollution, for my illustrative assignment. This idea came from a discussion held in my Advanced Digital Photography class, a few weeks ago. But first, for those of you who aren't well versed on the subject, I thought I'd throw in a little bit of background.

What is light pollution? 
Well, Google tells us that light pollution is a "brightening of the night sky caused by street lights and other man-made sources, which has a disruptive effect on natural cycles and inhibits the observation of stars and planets." and I'd say that's a pretty solid definition. 

Why do I care? 
Multiple reasons. 
One reason is that, because of light pollution I have to travel far away from town to get photos like this.

Photo by Nicole Winona

Another, is because believe it or not, there certain places in the world that are so densely populated with people, thus densely populated with light, that no stars can be seen at all. This means that there are probably (I say probably, because I personally do not know any) people in the world who have never seen natural wonders like the milky way, or a meteor shower, let alone even a shooting star. To me, that's just sad. I think that stars are something that everyone (no, not just photographers) should have the opportunity to appreciate in person.

So, what can we do about it? 
Well, in our class discussion, our teacher told us that cities can enforce lighting ordinances to help with the problem. Toquerville is an example of a city where an ordinance such as this has been proposed. Basically, lighting ordinances require outdoor lighting to be "night sky friendly" thus eliminating glare, light trespass and skyglow. (Which can be seen in the images at the top of this post. Primarily in the second photo.) 

My Take:
I took the top two photos just outside of town past the Chuckwalla trail head. I thought this would be the perfect place to display how light pollution effects the sky, because it's close enough to town for the haze of the city lights to be seen, yet far enough away that the stars are somewhat visible. I think that the second image illustrates best, what I was trying to achieve because of the extreme gradient created by the lights. For that shot, I pointed my camera to the south, toward town so that I was directly shooting into the pollution, whereas the first photo was shot facing north, away from the pollution. 

I thought this was an interesting topic, because before we talked about it in my class, this was something that I hadn't really considered as a problem that could be resolved. I can see how it would become somewhat of a controversial issue, mostly because I think that home and business owners would view it as a hassle, and an unwanted expense to change exterior lighting, but I definitely see the benefits of it. We're really spoiled here in Southern Utah, because although we clearly have some light pollution, we have much less than most other places. Dark Sky Finder shows that un-polluted skies can be found as close as 30 minutes away. 

My teacher, Alex Chamberlain, made an interesting comment about light pollution while we were in our discussion. He explained that air pollution, water pollution, litter, and other types of damage that we as humans inflict on the earth take years to undo, and in some cases cannot be undone at all. Light pollution is the exception to this. It can literally be undone with the flip of a switch. It's interesting to think of the below picture as an every night possibility.

Photo by Nicole Winona